VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-JACKSON

HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-JACKSON

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-JACKSON VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City JACKSON   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have JACKSON
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 434 W NORTH ST  
Zip Code 49202  
Phone 5177873250  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
73  (18.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/24/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(52.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(48.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
17  (9.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
64  (27.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (5.31 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/05/2011
date Of Correction: 05/24/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/07/2011
date Of Correction: 02/14/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/08/2010
date Of Correction: 10/20/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/11/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 06/15/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/27/2011
date Of Correction: 07/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/05/2011
date Of Correction: 05/24/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/03/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/21/2010
date Of Correction: 08/05/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/27/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 11/10/2011
date Of Correction: 12/20/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 11/10/2011
date Of Correction: 12/20/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 11/10/2011
date Of Correction: 12/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/08/2010
date Of Correction: 10/20/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/11/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (10.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.6 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.20 % (10.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.5 % (1.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8 % (7.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9 % (11.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.4 % (17.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.6 % (18.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.2 % (14.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.5 % (14.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 % (12.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 % (11.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.50 % (7.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7 % (1.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
68.7 % (25.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.8 % (10.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (7.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2 % (13.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.9 % (19.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (2.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved