VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-KALAMAZOO

HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-KALAMAZOO

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HEARTLAND HEALTH CARE CENTER-KALAMAZOO VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KALAMAZOO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have KALAMAZOO
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 3625 W MICHIGAN AVE  
Zip Code 49006  
Phone 2693754550  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
172  (63.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
105  (13.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
61 % (22.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/25/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
16  (8.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/15/2012
date Of Correction: 03/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 08/03/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 06/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/01/2011
date Of Correction: 12/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 08/03/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 09/16/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/18/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 08/03/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Clinical Records For 1) The Length Of Time That Is Required By State Law; Or 2) Five Years From The Date Of Discharge When No Requirement In State Law.
survey Date: 01/19/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 11/01/2011
date Of Correction: 12/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 11/01/2011
date Of Correction: 12/07/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 % (2.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (14.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3 % (8.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.1 % (1.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.6 % (0.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87 % (3.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (11.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.7 % (2.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3 % (1.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.2 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (9.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (6.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8 % (9.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.4 % (2.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.6 % (1.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.5 % (4.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.7 % (1.36 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved