Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| HEBERT NURSING HOME | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
124 (32.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.52 (0.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
| Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.34 (0.5 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
| Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.86 (0.73 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
| Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (5.42 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
| Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (0.03 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
| Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 07/19/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Notice To The Resident Before A Room Or Roommate Change. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/19/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011 |
||||
| Administration Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility. survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/09/2012 date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
26.1 % (1.01 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.7 % (31.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
12.4-2413.6-24 % (4.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5.5 % (7.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
33.3 % (11.24 % lower than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
0.9 % (14.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
21.1 % (7.64 % higher than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
30.6 % (5.58 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
89.5 % (4.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
87.8 % (3.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
27.2 % (1.81 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
11.9 % (2.2 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
10.6 % (1.38 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
36.2 % (7.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
18.3 % (8.72 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
1.7 % (18.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.2 % (7.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
29 % (4.24 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
87.6 % (6.16 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
80.5 % (5.75 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
9.6 % (7.74 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||