VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HENRY FORD CONT CARE CTR-ROSEV

HENRY FORD CONT CARE CTR-ROSEV

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HENRY FORD CONT CARE CTR-ROSEV VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROSEVILLE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ROSEVILLE
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 25375 KELLY RD  
Zip Code 48066  
Phone 5867736022  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
172  (63.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/23/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/22/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.52  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/16/2011
date Of Correction: 07/12/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 % (31.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.1 % (1.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2 % (4.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49 % (4.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.4 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3 % (21.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (3.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.4 % (2.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.9 % (1.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 % (12.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9 % (16.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 % (1.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45 % (1.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.1 % (3.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5 % (14.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.3 % (5.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.8 % (2.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.1 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 12.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved