VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HERITAGE MANOR OF ROLLING FORK

HERITAGE MANOR OF ROLLING FORK

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HERITAGE MANOR OF ROLLING FORK VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROLLING FORK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ROLLING FORK
State attribute explanation MS   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have MS
Street 431 WEST RACE STREET / PO BOX 279  
Zip Code 39159  
Phone 6628736218  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
54  (54.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
50  (41.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(3.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
50  (41.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.03  (0.56 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 03/10/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/28/2009
date Of Correction: 05/30/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/10/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/10/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.4 (90.3) % (7.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 % (10.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5 % (23.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.2 % (9.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.9 % (18.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7 % (8.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 % (1.68 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.8 % (14.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 % (5.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 % (14.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.8 % (34.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
15.1 % (4.37 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4 % (20.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved