VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HERITAGE MANOR OF STRATMORE NURSING & REHAB CTR

HERITAGE MANOR OF STRATMORE NURSING & REHAB CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HERITAGE MANOR OF STRATMORE NURSING & REHAB CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SHREVEPORT   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SHREVEPORT
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 530 STRATMORE DRIVE  
Zip Code 71105  
Phone 3185242022  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
142  (33.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
127  (35.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
127  (35.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/04/2010
date Of Correction: 08/27/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.8 % (7.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 % (31.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9 % (7.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.1 % (0.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (13.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
32.2 % (3.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 % (38.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 % (9.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
14.4 % (1.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.4 % (8.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.3 % (0.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 % (4.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.3 % (2.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
26.6 (79.9) % (6.74 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
8.7 % (29.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.4 % (0.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34 % (9.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4 % (15.96 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.6 % (17.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 


Scroll To Top

saved