VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HERITAGE OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

HERITAGE OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HERITAGE OAKS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LUBBOCK   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LUBBOCK
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 5301 UNIVERSITY AVE  
Zip Code 79413  
Phone 8067958792  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
159  (50.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
126  (34.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
79 % (4.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
126  (34.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.46  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/19/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/19/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: 11/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: 12/29/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/19/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/19/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/19/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 % (30.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.1 % (3.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 % (8.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7 % (25.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.4 % (1.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5 % (10.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.4 % (8.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.2 % (6.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4 % (3.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (20.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1 % (7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.2 % (2.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.4 % (3.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (5.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (17.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (3.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.1 % (1.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.8 % (11.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89 % (14.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 13.9 / 15.3 % 


Scroll To Top

saved