Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
HICKORY CREEK AT COLUMBUS | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
35 (56.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.56 (0.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.6 (0.24 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.16 (0.43 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (5.42 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (0.03 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/04/2009 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/28/2012 date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 02/28/2012 date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 11/03/2011 date Of Correction: 12/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 11/03/2011 date Of Correction: 12/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 11/03/2011 date Of Correction: 12/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 11/03/2011 date Of Correction: 12/08/2011 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 05/27/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 05/04/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 05/04/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 05/27/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/04/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/04/2009 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 05/04/2011 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
5.3 % (11.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.1 % (10.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6.1 % (22.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
6.1 % (37.58 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
6.1 % (9.42 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
27.8 (82.0) % (2.41 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
9.3 % (4.8 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
7 % (2.22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
2.20 % (6.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
1.1 % (9.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
9.6 % (0.02 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6.2 % (13.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.1 % (7.63 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
40.5 % (15.74 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
45 % (36.44 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
43.2 % (31.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|