VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY NURSING HOME

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City GOFFSTOWN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GOFFSTOWN
State attribute explanation NH   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH
Street 400 MAST ROAD  
Zip Code 3045  
Phone 6036275540  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
300  (191.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
280  (188.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/29/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
279  (187.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/29/2011
date Of Correction: 11/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/29/2011
date Of Correction: 11/08/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.2 % (7.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (5.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2 % (10.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7 % (2.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (13.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.8 % (4.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 % (23.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (10.72 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.6 % (10.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.1 % (14.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 % (44.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.9 % (7.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4 % (19.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.4 % (0.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1 % (7.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2 % (2.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.4 % (1.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.3 % (2.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14 % (10.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89 % (7.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.5 % (20.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5 % (14.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved