VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HILLVIEW NURSING & REHAB

HILLVIEW NURSING & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HILLVIEW NURSING & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PLATTE CITY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PLATTE CITY
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 220 O'ROURKE DRIVE, PO BOX 1310  
Zip Code 64079  
Phone 8168585222  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
70  (21.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
58 % (25.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/25/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/25/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
70  (21.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16  (0.43 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 04/03/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 04/03/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 04/03/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/28/2011
date Of Correction: 03/24/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 09/08/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
46.5 % (21.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7 % (12.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.3 % (36.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 % (6.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (24.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7 % (17.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine 22.2:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.1 % (59.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1 % (8.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44.4 % (19.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (8.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.6 % (3.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.5 % (30.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (5.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4 % (15.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
33.8 % (47.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.5 % (50.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.7 % (12.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved