VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HILO MEDICAL CENTER

HILO MEDICAL CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HILO MEDICAL CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City HILO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have HILO
State attribute explanation HI   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have HI
Street 1190 WAIANUENUE AVENUE  
Zip Code 96720  
Phone 8089744700  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
134  (25.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
109  (17.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/21/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
109  (17.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47  (0.7 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63  (0.79 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
3.11  (1.52 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/04/2010
date Of Correction: 05/20/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/04/2010
date Of Correction: 05/20/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28 % (2.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7 % (29.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19 % (2.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.4 % (11.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.1 % (8.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.6 % (5.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.8 % (10.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.8 % (10.86 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.6 (78.1) % (0.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8 % (4.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6 % (2.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.3 % (0.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 % (8.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.9 % (5.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.9 % (12.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.8 % (20.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
17.2 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved