HOLLAND HOME - FULTON MANOR

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	GRAND RAPIDS	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have GRAND RAPIDS
State attribute explanation	MI	vs	2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI	compare MI Nursing Homes USA
Street	1450 E FULTON ST
Zip Code	49503
Phone	6166432600
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	82 (26.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (82)
Total Number of Residents	80 (11.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (80)
Percent of Occupied Beds	98 % (14.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (98) %
Health Survey Date	9/29/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/28/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	3 (53.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8 (0.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	72 (19.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.31 (0.54 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.91 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.22 (0.63 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (5.48 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/01/2010 date Of Correction: 07/09/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/22/2009 date Of Correction: 02/01/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/13/2009 date Of Correction: 06/02/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 04/13/2009 date Of Correction: 06/02/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 12/21/2011 date Of Correction: 01/31/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 12/21/2011 date Of Correction: 01/31/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 09/06/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 12/21/2011 date Of Correction: 01/31/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.3 (79.3) % (1.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.5 % (14.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.1 % (7.48 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.9 % (9.73 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.9 % (6.56 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	95 % (11.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1 (44.9 lower than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.5 % (1.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (21.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.7 % (11.4 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	67.3 % (23.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.9 % (5.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.3 % (17.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.5 % (35.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.8 % (5.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.6 % (4.16 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	90.2 % (8.76 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.9 % (16.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %