Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
HOLLY CONVALESCENT CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
65 (26.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.57 (0.2 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.35 (0.49 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.92 (0.67 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (5.42 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.07 (0.03 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 10/14/2010 date Of Correction: 10/22/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/11/2010 date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/16/2009 date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 03/29/2011 date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 09/16/2009 date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/06/2009 date Of Correction: 06/24/2009 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 10/14/2010 date Of Correction: 10/22/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 09/16/2009 date Of Correction: 10/26/2009 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility. survey Date: 08/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/15/2010 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
40.4 % (15.31 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
18.5 % (1.84 % higher than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
7.2 % (8.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
6.2 % (7.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
4.9 % (23.48 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
27.7 % (15.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
9.2 % (6.32 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
37.7 % (12.31 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
15.1 % (1 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
2 % (7.22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
70.3 % (26.92 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
4.3 % (6.35 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
8.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
3.4 % (16.46 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
27.1 % (11.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
11.4 % (0.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|