VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF GORMAN

HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF GORMAN

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF GORMAN VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GORMAN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GORMAN
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 600 W ROOSEVELT  
Zip Code 76454  
Phone 2547342202  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
97  (11.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
26  (65.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
27 % (56.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
26  (65.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.46  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/03/2009
date Of Correction: 10/25/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 06/23/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 06/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/22/2010
date Of Correction: 09/21/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/22/2010
date Of Correction: 09/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 % (6.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.1 % (22 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 % (2.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1 % (8.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
25.5 % (13.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved