VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HOSANNA HEALTH AND REHAB OF PIEDMONT LLC

HOSANNA HEALTH AND REHAB OF PIEDMONT LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HOSANNA HEALTH AND REHAB OF PIEDMONT LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PIEDMONT   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PIEDMONT
State attribute explanation SC   vs 1.2% Nursing Homes USA have SC
Street 109 BENTZ ROAD  
Zip Code 29673  
Phone 8648455177  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
88  (20.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
79  (12.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/22/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/23/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
79  (12.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.77  (0.18 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 % (10.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.8 % (0.14 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 % (1.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
21.3 % (9.47 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (12.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.3 % (0.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.4 % (9.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.6 % (5.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.1 % (12.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17 % (2.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.4 % (4.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
19.9 % (11.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3 % (12.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.8 % (30.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.4 % (11.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2 % (11.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 % (21.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved