VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FAC

INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FAC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
INGHAM COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FAC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OKEMOS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OKEMOS
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 3860 DOBIE RD  
Zip Code 48864  
Phone 5173816100  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
236  (127.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
227  (135.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
227  (135.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93  (0.16 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.50  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16  (5.33 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/28/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2011
date Of Correction: 06/03/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/24/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/24/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/02/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Doctors Orders For The Resident's Immediate Care, At The Time The Resident Was Admitted.
survey Date: 02/02/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (12.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 % (5.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65.4 % (20.86 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (12.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (8.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.2 % (12.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 % (38.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9 % (16.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9 % (13.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.7 % (15.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 % (44.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (13.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (12.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8 % (4.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4 % (5.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.3 % (14.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13 % (6.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.3 % (34.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (8.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (15.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81 % (0.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.2 % (24.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (2.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved