VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
INTERCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NORWALK   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have NORWALK
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 12627 STUDEBAKER ROAD  
Zip Code 90650  
Phone 5628684767  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
86  (22.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
75  (16.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/22/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
75  (16.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.68  (0.84 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.35  (0.76 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/22/2011
date Of Correction: 07/23/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 % (7.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (31.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.8 % (18.14 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.8 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.7 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 % (25.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7 % (36.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 23.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.7 % (11.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (10.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.6 % (7.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.4 % (2.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5 % (17.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.7 % (2.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.7 % (2.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (18.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 % (33.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.3 % (2.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.6 % (32.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
51.4 % (23.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved