IRVING NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	IRVING	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have IRVING
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	619 N BRITAIN RD
Zip Code	75061
Phone	9727859300
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	88 (20.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (88)
Total Number of Residents	60 (31.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (60)
Percent of Occupied Beds	68 % (15.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (68) %
Health Survey Date	7/28/2011
Fire Survey Date	7/27/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	3 (55.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	3 (53.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	11 (3.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	60 (31.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.58 (0.19 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.58 (1.01 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (5.46 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/26/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 01/26/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 01/26/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 09/01/2010 date Of Correction: 09/14/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Complete, Dated Lab Records In The Resident's File. survey Date: 08/03/2009 date Of Correction: 08/15/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 08/21/2009 date Of Correction: 10/15/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	44.8 % (19.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.3 % (5.36 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	35.5 % (9.04 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.4 % (9.23 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.3 % (10.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	73.9 % (10.74 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	69.6 % (14.34 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	42.9 % (17.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.8 % (4.3 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.2 % (4.02 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.7 % (6.8 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	32.6 % (10.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.9 % (3.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.3 % (7.28 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.6 % (37.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	32.6 % (7.84 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	59.6 % (21.84 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	57.6 % (17.15 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	4.2 % (13.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %