VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > JACKIE WITHROW HOSPITAL

JACKIE WITHROW HOSPITAL

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
JACKIE WITHROW HOSPITAL VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City BECKLEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BECKLEY
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street 105 SOUTH EISENHOWER DRIVE  
Zip Code 25801  
Phone 3042566600  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
199  (90.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
90  (1.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
45 % (38.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/2/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
13  (5.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
90  (1.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.23 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.83  (0.24 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 12/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 12/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/17/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/02/2009
date Of Correction: 08/31/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/05/2011
date Of Correction: 05/10/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Detailed, Written Plan For Disasters And Emergencies, Such As Fire, Severe Weather, And Missing Residents.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 04/05/2011
date Of Correction: 05/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/07/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 07/02/2009
date Of Correction: 08/31/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
48.5 % (23.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.2 % (12.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36 % (8.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 % (10.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (6.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
47.4 % (22.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.2 % (15.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.8 % (1.58 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36 % (7.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 % (5.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (6.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved