JAMESTOWN NURSING AND REHAB, LLC

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	ROGERS	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have ROGERS
State attribute explanation	AR	vs	1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR	compare AR Nursing Homes USA
Street	2001 HAMPTON PLACE
Zip Code	72758
Phone	4799869945
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	140 (31.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (140)
Total Number of Residents	64 (27.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (64)
Percent of Occupied Beds	46 % (37.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (46) %
Health Survey Date	6/17/2011
Fire Survey Date	6/15/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8

Staff Information
Number of Residents	64 (27.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.4 (0.37 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.15 (0.31 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.54 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/04/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/04/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/04/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 10/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/27/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/27/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 06/17/2011 date Of Correction: 07/17/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 06/07/2012 date Of Correction: 07/04/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 01/14/2011 date Of Correction: 01/28/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.9 % (2.19 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.3 % (7.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.3 % (12.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	10 % (18.38 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.4 % (9.62 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	56.6 % (28.04 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.8 % (5.86 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4 % (11.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.7 (72.9) % (2.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	0.8 % (13.3 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.4 % (1.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.7 % (0.2 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	27.4 % (15.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.2 % (14.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.1 % (37.43 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.2 % (11.56 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	49.4 % (32.04 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94.4 % (19.65 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.2 % (14.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %