VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > JOHN HEINZ SENIOR REHAB CARE

JOHN HEINZ SENIOR REHAB CARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
JOHN HEINZ SENIOR REHAB CARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WILKES-BARRE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WILKES-BARRE
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 150 MUNDY STREET  
Zip Code 18702  
Phone 5708308995  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
21  (87.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
16  (75.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
76 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/16/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare  vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
16  (75.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.46  (1.69 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
3.18  (1.59 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (4.6 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.79 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/23/2010
date Of Correction: 10/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (30.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 % (1.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3 % (13.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.5 % (15.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7 % (45.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.4 % (4.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 % (16.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.8 % (25.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7 % (16.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved