VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > JOHN J KANE REGIONAL CENTER-GL

JOHN J KANE REGIONAL CENTER-GL

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
JOHN J KANE REGIONAL CENTER-GL VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PITTSBURGH   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have PITTSBURGH
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 955 RIVERMONT DRIVE  
Zip Code 15207  
Phone 4124226800  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
210  (101.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
198  (106.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/15/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/19/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(5.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
198  (106.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 01/25/2012
date Of Correction: 02/08/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
43.7 % (18.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 % (11.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8 % (4.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.5 % (18.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.7 % (11.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
8.8 % (34.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.2 % (8.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.7 % (2.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
45.3 % (19.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7 % (16.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.6 % (7.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (1.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (2.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.1 % (19.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (9.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 % (16.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.2 % (9.56 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78 % (3.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75 % (0.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27 % (9.66 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved