VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KEARSLEY REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

KEARSLEY REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KEARSLEY REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Philadelphia  vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have Philadelphia
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 2100 NORTH 49TH STREET  
Zip Code 19131  
Phone 2158771565  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
84  (24.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
82  (9.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
82  (9.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.54  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.98  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 06/16/2011
date Of Correction: 08/15/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7 % (5.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 % (0.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 % (14.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1 % (17.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 % (19.72 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.3 % (0.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.6 % (13.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4 % (43.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.5 % (8.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.2 % (6.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 % (4.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 % (0.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.8 % (15.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.1 % (10.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 7.9:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.7 % (2.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.8 % (12.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 16.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved