VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KETCHIKAN MED CTR NEW HORIZONS TRANSITIONAL CARE

KETCHIKAN MED CTR NEW HORIZONS TRANSITIONAL CARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KETCHIKAN MED CTR NEW HORIZONS TRANSITIONAL CARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KETCHIKAN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have KETCHIKAN
State attribute explanation AK   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have AK
Street 3100 TONGASS AVENUE  
Zip Code 99901  
Phone 9072255171  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
29  (79.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
16  (75.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
55 % (28.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/10/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/10/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
16  (75.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 07/09/2009
date Of Correction: 08/23/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.4 % (14.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.5 % (17.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2 % (19.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.7 % (0.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (7.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7 % (6.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37 % (12.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.6 % (5.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.2 % (23.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 % (8.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved