VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - ASPEN PARK

KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - ASPEN PARK

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - ASPEN PARK VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MOSCOW   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MOSCOW
State attribute explanation ID   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have ID
Street 420 ROWE STREET  
Zip Code 83843  
Phone 2088824576  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
70  (38.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
47  (44.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
67 % (16.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 8/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 2  
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 01/29/2010
date Of Correction: 03/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/30/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.6 (78.1) % (0.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.4 % (7.74 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 % (3.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.6 % (13.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (3.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.8 % (0.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.6 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3 % (2.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.8 % (7.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 % (4.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.2 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 % (37.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.1 % (9.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.7 % (0.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
54.7 % (20.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.3 % (0.96 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved