VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - NAMPA

KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - NAMPA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KINDRED NURSING & REHABILITATION - NAMPA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City NAMPA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NAMPA
State attribute explanation ID   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have ID
Street 404 NORTH HORTON STREET  
Zip Code 83651  
Phone 2084669292  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
72  (19.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
72 % (11.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/26/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 10  
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 11/16/2011
date Of Correction: 12/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 11/16/2011
date Of Correction: 12/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 06/08/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 06/08/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 11/16/2011
date Of Correction: 12/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3 % (16.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.8 % (15.14 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2 % (10.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (2.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (13.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.1 % (12.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
57.7 % (32.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.3 % (4.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 % (44.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.8 % (18.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.4 % (20.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3 % (7.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.5 % (10.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.2 % (0.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (9.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
50 % (25.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3 % (5.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.7 % (13.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 17.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved