KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHAB-KENNEBUNK

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	KENNEBUNK	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have KENNEBUNK
State attribute explanation	ME	vs	0.7% Nursing Homes USA have ME	compare ME Nursing Homes USA
Street	158
Zip Code	4043
Phone	2079857141
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	78 (30.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (78)
Total Number of Residents	60 (31.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (60)
Percent of Occupied Beds	77 % (6.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (77) %
Health Survey Date	6/10/2011
Fire Survey Date	6/10/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	16 (8.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	60 (31.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.24 (0.47 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.76 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2 (0.41 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	75.2 (69.71 higher than average)	vs	5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/09/2009 date Of Correction: 02/09/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/09/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Let Each Resident Choose A Personal Doctor. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/15/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/09/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/09/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/09/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Medically Necessary Lab Services/tests Are Ordered By The Attending Physician. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/14/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/15/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 06/09/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	18.6 (65.5) % (6.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3.1 % (29.85 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.7 % (2.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.4 % (7.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.4 % (9.06 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.3 % (24.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	34.5 % (9.48 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.2 % (6.56 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.4 % (12.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.1 (71.8) % (3.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.7 % (22 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.3 % (6.8 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.4 % (0.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.9 % (2.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	54.7 % (11.32 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1 % (9.65 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.6 % (0.02 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	7.1 % (12.76 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	28.7 % (3.94 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	83.7 % (2.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	85.9 % (11.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.6 / 3 %