KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHABILITATION-CROSS

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Sandy	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have Sandy
State attribute explanation	UT	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT	compare UT Nursing Homes USA
Street	575 EAST 11000 SOUTH
Zip Code	84070
Phone	8015717600
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	108 (0.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (108)
Total Number of Residents	79 (12.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (79)
Percent of Occupied Beds	73 % (10.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (73) %
Health Survey Date	12/15/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/12/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Limited Liability Company	vs	1.1% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Limited liability company	compare For profit - Limited liability company Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	79 (12.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.68 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.61 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.29 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.19 (5.3 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.19 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 05/05/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 05/05/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/05/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 05/02/2012 date Of Correction: 07/05/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%. survey Date: 05/02/2012 date Of Correction: 07/05/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/25/2010 date Of Correction: 04/11/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.7 % (7.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (30.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10 % (2.58 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	52.8 % (8.26 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	22.7 (72.9) % (7.07 % higher than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.3 % (22.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.2 % (40.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	57.2 % (27.44 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	61.3 % (22.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.2 % (9.19 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11 % (3.1 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	0.6 % (7.9 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50.5 % (7.12 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	18.9 % (8.25 % higher than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.2 % (2.38 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.6 % (13.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.3 % (35.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.1 % (9.63 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	35.3 % (10.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	57.7 % (23.74 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	58.1 % (16.65 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	8.8 % (8.54 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %