VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > KITTANNING CARE CENTER

KITTANNING CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
KITTANNING CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KITTANNING   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have KITTANNING
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 120 KITTANNING CARE DRIVE  
Zip Code 16201  
Phone 7245452273  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
93  (1.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
93  (1.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.68  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 08/28/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.8 % (11.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 17.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 % (3.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5 % (4.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3 % (21.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.9 % (38.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (3.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.4 % (0.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.7 % (5.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (13.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.6 % (14.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (4.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 % (1.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.8 % (0.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6 % (3.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.2 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.4 % (32.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (8.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27 % (2.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.1 % (1.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.1 % (8.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.8 % (0.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved