VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LA PALOMA HEALTHCARE CENTER

LA PALOMA HEALTHCARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LA PALOMA HEALTHCARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OCEANSIDE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OCEANSIDE
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 3232 THUNDER DRIVE  
Zip Code 92056  
Phone 7607242193  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
93  (15.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
89  (2.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/17/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 1  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
89  (2.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.91  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/16/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5 % (11.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (32.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7 % (14.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (8.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 % (2.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8 % (24.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.8 % (39.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.8 % (3.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94 % (9.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.9 % (10.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 % (11.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3 % (4.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.2 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.3 % (3.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9 % (14.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.7 % (34.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6 % (10.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.1 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8 % (12.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 % (18.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved