VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LAKE HILLS INN

LAKE HILLS INN

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LAKE HILLS INN VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LAKE HAVASU CITY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LAKE HAVASU CITY
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 2781 OSBORN DRIVE  
Zip Code 86406  
Phone 9285055552  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
104  (4.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
76  (15.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/30/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
76  (15.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.71  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 18.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.5 % (29.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7 % (0.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 % (2.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.6 % (4.06 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.7 % (20.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44.2 % (19.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97 % (12.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.3 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (42.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.8 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 % (5.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 % (10.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 % (1.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 % (9.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11 % (0.27 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.3 % (12.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1 % (16.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.7 % (24.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.4 % (5.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved