LAKEPOINT RETIREMENT & REHAB CENTER OF WICHITA

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	WICHITA	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have WICHITA
State attribute explanation	KS	vs	2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS	compare KS Nursing Homes USA
Street	1315 N WEST STREET
Zip Code	67203
Phone	3169431295
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	110 (1.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (110)
Total Number of Residents	88 (3.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (88)
Percent of Occupied Beds	80 % (3.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (80) %
Health Survey Date	7/13/2011
Fire Survey Date	2/22/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	88 (3.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.37 (0.4 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.7 (0.14 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.07 (0.52 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.13 (5.36 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.13 (0.03 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/05/2009 date Of Correction: 09/04/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 04/07/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 07/13/2011 date Of Correction: 08/11/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23.7 (74.7) % (1.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.4 % (11.26 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.8 % (8.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	14.9-28 % (3.07 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	9.5 % (6.13 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.3 % (42.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38.3 % (13.28 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	88 % (3.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93.2 % (9.26 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	9.3 % (6.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.2 % (0.19 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.3 % (0.8 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	35.6 % (7.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.4 % (2.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.50 % (18.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.4 % (37.13 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	9.2 % (1.53 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	30.8 % (6.04 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	77.5 % (3.94 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	88.7 % (13.95 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	14.9-28 % (2.44 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %