VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LAKEWOOD CONVALESCENT HOME, INC

LAKEWOOD CONVALESCENT HOME, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LAKEWOOD CONVALESCENT HOME, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City HOT SPRINGS   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have HOT SPRINGS
State attribute explanation AR   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR
Street 260 LAKEPARK DRIVE  
Zip Code 71901  
Phone 5012621920  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
80  (28.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
63  (28.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
79 % (4.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/25/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/22/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 9  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
63  (28.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
(0.23 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.61 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.45  (0.86 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 01/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 11/14/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 % (5.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.1 % (8.44 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (6.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
23.3 % (11.47 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7 % (10.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15 % (1.54 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5 % (23.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (41.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.7 (90.9) % (7.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.4-2413.6-24 % (11.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (14.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (0.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 % (4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.8 % (22.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.2 % (4.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.8 % (6.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 % (14.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (35.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
18.3 % (7.57 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.8 % (10.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.7 % (10.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.5 % (16.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (14.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved