VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LARCHWOOD INNS

LARCHWOOD INNS

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LARCHWOOD INNS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City GRAND JUNCTION   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GRAND JUNCTION
State attribute explanation CO   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have CO
Street 2845 NORTH 15TH STREET  
Zip Code 81506  
Phone 9702450022  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
130  (21.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
113  (21.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/23/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
113  (21.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.33  (0.56 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.02  (0.43 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/07/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/03/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 09/03/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.8 % (18.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (32.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.4 % (0.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
68.4 % (23.86 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.9 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (25.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.5 % (13.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.8 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
68.4 % (15.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 % (44 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.8 % (17.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (0.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 % (3.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.2 % (16.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.2 % (0.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (7.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (15.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.3 % (11.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.1 % (18.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.2 % (1.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved