VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LARGO REHAB & SPA

LARGO REHAB & SPA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LARGO REHAB & SPA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LARGO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LARGO
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 9035 BRYAN DAIRY RD  
Zip Code 33777  
Phone 7273959619  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
158  (49.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
149  (57.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/13/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 10  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
149  (57.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.54  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.03  (0.19 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.57  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 09/23/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/06/2012
date Of Correction: 04/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/08/2011
date Of Correction: 03/02/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients.
survey Date: 01/06/2010
date Of Correction: 01/07/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.2 % (6.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (31.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.5 % (1.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
62.7 % (18.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (13.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 % (2.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1 % (25.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (41.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.5 % (11.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.4 % (7.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (14.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28 % (2.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65.3 % (21.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.6 % (15.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38 % (13.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8 % (14.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved