LAURELS HEALTH & REHAB AT KINGSTON, THE

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	KINGSTON	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have KINGSTON
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	702 THIRD AVENUE
Zip Code	18704
Phone	5702835848
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	65 (43.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (65)
Total Number of Residents	62 (29.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (62)
Percent of Occupied Beds	95 % (11.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (95) %
Health Survey Date	8/18/2011
Fire Survey Date	8/29/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	54 (37.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.03 (0.26 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.13 (0.29 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.16 (0.57 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.31 (5.18 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.31 (0.21 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/13/2010 date Of Correction: 01/31/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 01/06/2010 date Of Correction: 01/18/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 12/13/2010 date Of Correction: 01/31/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 07/23/2010 date Of Correction: 08/16/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care. survey Date: 03/06/2012 date Of Correction: 03/19/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 04/08/2009 date Of Correction: 06/16/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/28/2010 date Of Correction: 08/16/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.1 % (6.01 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.3 % (9.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.3 % (11.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.3 % (4.72 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (15.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.8 % (14.86 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.9 % (44 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	30.7 % (5.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.1 % (7 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.5 % (1.72 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.8 % (3.7 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	54.8 % (11.42 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.1 % (6.48 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	6.2 % (4.53 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.3 % (1.46 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	80.8 % (0.64 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	99.6 % (24.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	31.1 % (13.76 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %