VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LAWRENCE HALL NURSING CENTER

LAWRENCE HALL NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LAWRENCE HALL NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City WALNUT RIDGE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WALNUT RIDGE
State attribute explanation AR   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR
Street 1051 WEST FREE STREET  
Zip Code 72476  
Phone 8708861295  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
179  (70.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
155  (63.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/11/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 9  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
155  (63.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.53 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/11/2012
date Of Correction: 06/10/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/11/2012
date Of Correction: 06/10/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/31/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/31/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/31/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/31/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.
survey Date: 08/16/2011
date Of Correction: 09/15/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11 % (5.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.9 % (2.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.5 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (5.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.2-20 % (17.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.1 % (39.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (12.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.8 % (2.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.4 % (1.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 % (4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.7 % (0.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.9 % (3.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.5 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.6 % (34.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.6 % (15.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.8 % (5.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80.4 % (5.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved