LENA LIVING CENTER | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

LENA LIVING CENTER

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LENA	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have LENA
State attribute explanation	IL	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have IL	compare IL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1010 SOUTH LOGAN STREET
Zip Code	61048
Phone	8153694561
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	92 (16.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (92)
Total Number of Residents	75 (16.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (75)
Percent of Occupied Beds	82 % (1.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (82) %
Health Survey Date	6/19/2012
Fire Survey Date	6/14/2012
Sprinkler Status	Not Sprinklered	vs	1.1% Nursing Homes USA have Not Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	3 (55.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	4 (52.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	75 (16.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.85 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.57 (0.27 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.43 (0.16 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (5.41 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/05/2011 date Of Correction: 08/08/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 12/22/2010 date Of Correction: 12/28/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/10/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 08/18/2011 date Of Correction: 08/19/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/24/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 01/25/2011 date Of Correction: 01/26/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 02/10/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 08/18/2011 date Of Correction: 08/19/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 02/10/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 08/26/2009 date Of Correction: 09/30/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/04/2009 date Of Correction: 09/09/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Develop A Post-discharge Plan With The Resident And Family For The Resident's Care After Leaving The Nursing Home. survey Date: 08/18/2011 date Of Correction: 08/19/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 08/04/2009 date Of Correction: 09/09/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 08/26/2009 date Of Correction: 09/30/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.8 % (6.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.9 % (8.93 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8 % (7.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.1 % (6.36 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.7 % (37.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.8 % (21.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	86.8 % (2.16 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	82.5 % (1.44 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.7 % (42.2 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	9.1 % (16.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.6 % (7.5 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	0.8 % (8.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.7 % (4.8 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	12.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.7 % (2.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.6 % (33.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.5 % (13.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	87.8 % (6.36 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	77.6 % (2.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.1 % (16.24 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %