VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LEON SULLIVAN HEALTH CARE CENTER

LEON SULLIVAN HEALTH CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LEON SULLIVAN HEALTH CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Seattle  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Seattle
State attribute explanation WA   vs 1.4% Nursing Homes USA have WA
Street 2611 SOUTH DEARBORN  
Zip Code 98144  
Phone 2063256700  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
173  (64.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/15/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
25  (17.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.42  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/29/2011
date Of Correction: 07/25/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/31/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/12/2009
date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/15/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 09/21/2010
date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/02/2010
date Of Correction: 01/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/21/2010
date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/21/2010
date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/15/2010 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/28/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/12/2011
date Of Correction: 10/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 06/25/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Special Or Therapeutic Diets Are Ordered By The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16 % (9.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (1.94 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (4.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.5 % (20.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 % (8.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9 % (23.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.6 % (11.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.3 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.7 % (8.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4 % (7.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.6 % (6.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.7 % (11.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.7 % (4.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4 % (14.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.2 % (12.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.4 % (5.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.3 % (4.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.1 % (6.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved