VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LIFE CARE CENTER OF COLLEGEDALE

LIFE CARE CENTER OF COLLEGEDALE

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LIFE CARE CENTER OF COLLEGEDALE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City COLLEGEDALE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have COLLEGEDALE
State attribute explanation TN   vs 2.1% Nursing Homes USA have TN
Street PO BOX 658, 9210 APISON PIKE  
Zip Code 37315  
Phone 4233962182  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
124  (15.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
103  (11.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
83 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/7/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/5/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
103  (11.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (5.07 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.32 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/09/2012
date Of Correction: 04/26/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/08/2010
date Of Correction: 12/26/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/17/2009
date Of Correction: 12/11/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 11/17/2009
date Of Correction: 12/11/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 06/23/2009
date Of Correction: 07/31/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.1 % (17.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6 % (15.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.5 % (3.92 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.7 % (4.87 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.7 % (22.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (24.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.2 % (42.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.3 % (14.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98 % (14.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.9 % (18.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (9.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.6 % (1.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 % (0.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
72.5 % (29.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9 % (9.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.2 % (14.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.9 % (34.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 % (16.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98 % (23.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 16.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved