VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LIFE CARE CENTER OF LAS VEGAS

LIFE CARE CENTER OF LAS VEGAS

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LIFE CARE CENTER OF LAS VEGAS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LAS VEGAS   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have LAS VEGAS
State attribute explanation NV   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have NV
Street 6151 VEGAS DRIVE  
Zip Code 89108  
Phone 7026484900  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
239  (130.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
201  (109.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/6/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/2/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
201  (109.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.83  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.57  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 12/06/2011
date Of Correction: 01/20/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 06/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 04/05/2011
date Of Correction: 04/21/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 01/26/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/26/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 06/03/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.1 % (14.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.2 % (32.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1 % (9.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
74.3 % (29.76 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.3 % (4.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3 % (25.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.3 (79.3) % (1.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.8 % (0.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.6 % (0.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (11.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.4 % (12.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (3.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 % (5.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
74.7 % (31.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 % (16.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29 % (4.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.1 % (2.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.2 % (2.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved