LIFE CARE CENTER OF SIERRA VISTA

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SIERRA VISTA	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have SIERRA VISTA
State attribute explanation	AZ	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ	compare AZ Nursing Homes USA
Street	2305 EAST WILCOX DRIVE
Zip Code	85635
Phone	5204581050
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	152 (43.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (152)
Total Number of Residents	96 (4.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (96)
Percent of Occupied Beds	63 % (20.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (63) %
Health Survey Date	1/12/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/18/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	22

Staff Information
Number of Residents	96 (4.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.2 (0.43 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.64 (0.2 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.84 (0.25 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	75.2 (69.71 higher than average)	vs	5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Access To A Telephone For Resident To Use In Private. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor. survey Date: 01/07/2011 date Of Correction: 02/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 09/17/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.2 % (31.75 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.7 % (9.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	22.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.7 % (10.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	14.9-28 % (1.44 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.1 % (24.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.9-28 % (10.12 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	98 % (13.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	99 % (15.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	4.1 % (41.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.3 % (10.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.2 % (7.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.9 % (5.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	20.5 % (12 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	27.6 % (15.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11 % (1.42 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.1 % (15.76 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.9-24 % (7.86 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	96.3 % (14.86 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	97.5 % (22.75 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.9 % (14.44 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %