VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LIFE CARE CENTER OF SOUTH MTN.

LIFE CARE CENTER OF SOUTH MTN.

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LIFE CARE CENTER OF SOUTH MTN. VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PHOENIX   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have PHOENIX
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 8008 S. JESSE OWENS PARKWAY  
Zip Code 85040  
Phone 6022432780  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
124  (15.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
93  (1.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
75 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
93  (1.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.74  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/17/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/17/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/19/2011
date Of Correction: 06/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/17/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Medically Necessary Lab Services/tests Are Ordered By The Attending Physician.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/17/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 06/24/2009
date Of Correction: 07/14/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.1 % (19.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (32.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 % (1.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.8 % (10.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73 % (28.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.2 % (12.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5 % (3.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.4 (88.5) % (6.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.4 % (13.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7 % (45.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.1 % (23.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.7 % (4.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (2.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
70.8 % (27.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.2-20 % (1.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.3 % (7.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.7 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.4 % (18.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9 % (16.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved