Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
LINCOLN HAVEN NURSING & REHAB COMMUNITY | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
37 (54.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.1 (0.33 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.21 (0.63 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.3 (0.29 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.13 (5.36 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.13 (0.03 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/03/2012 date Of Correction: 04/11/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/11/2012 date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/25/2011 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/25/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/25/2011 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 01/11/2012 date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 04/03/2012 date Of Correction: 04/11/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 04/03/2012 date Of Correction: 04/11/2012 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
5.8 % (27.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
95.7 % (11.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
30.3 % (4.91 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4.4 % (19.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
15.5 % (1.4 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
10.6 % (1.38 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
4.5 % (4 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
28.1 % (15.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
1.4 % (9.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
4.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
1.1 % (18.76 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
12.2 % (26.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
33.3 % (8.54 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
95.2 % (13.76 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened | 8.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|