VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > LITTLEFIELD HOSPITALITY

LITTLEFIELD HOSPITALITY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
LITTLEFIELD HOSPITALITY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City LITTLEFIELD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LITTLEFIELD
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1609 W WAYLON JENNINGS BLVD  
Zip Code 79339  
Phone 8063854544  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
61  (47.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
52  (39.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
85 % (1.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
17  (9.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
52  (39.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.38  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (0.79 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 05/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 01/30/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Rooms That Are At Least 80 Square Feet Per Resident In Multiple Rooms And 100 Square Feet For Single Resident Rooms.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: 01/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: 01/06/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/22/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Access To A Telephone For Resident To Use In Private.
survey Date: 05/25/2012
date Of Correction: 06/18/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 11/10/2011
date Of Correction: 12/23/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Access To A Telephone For Resident To Use In Private.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/23/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 10/06/2009
date Of Correction: 10/10/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 12/31/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.3 % (23.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 % (5.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 23.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1 % (8.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
52.4 % (27.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.6 % (15.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.3 % (6.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.7 % (18.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (7.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.4 % (3.54 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
17.5 % (6.77 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.4 % (14.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.2 % (13.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.2 % (1.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved