VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MAISON DE'VILLE NURSING HOME

MAISON DE'VILLE NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MAISON DE'VILLE NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City HOUMA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have HOUMA
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 107 SOUTH HOLLYWOOD DRIVE  
Zip Code 70360  
Phone 9858763250  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
200  (91.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
128  (36.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
64 % (19.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/4/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/4/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
13  (5.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
128  (36.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.31  (0.46 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.02  (0.57 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 09/10/2009
date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 01/08/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 01/08/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/08/2009
date Of Correction: 09/22/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/08/2011
date Of Correction: 07/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 01/08/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/10/2009
date Of Correction: 10/15/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/08/2009
date Of Correction: 09/22/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/27/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Hire A Qualified Full-time Social Worker In A Facility With More Than 120 Beds.
survey Date: 11/24/2009
date Of Correction: 01/08/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/27/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 01/27/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 01/27/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.9 % (13.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.5 % (10.84 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.6 % (1.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.4 % (29.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.4 % (10.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (10.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (21.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.8 % (36.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
35.6 % (49.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
43.5 % (40.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.3 % (12.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 23.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.4 % (27.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6 % (3.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4 % (14.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.6 % (31.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.5 % (7.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
31.1 % (50.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.7 % (50.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 % (13.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved