VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-KING OF PRUSSIA

MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-KING OF PRUSSIA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-KING OF PRUSSIA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KING OF PRUSSIA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have KING OF PRUSSIA
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 600 WEST VALLEY FORGE ROAD  
Zip Code 19406  
Phone 6103371775  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
134  (42.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
134  (42.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.15  (0.38 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.83  (0.24 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (5.32 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 10/15/2010
date Of Correction: 11/22/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Let The Resident Or The Resident's Legal Representative The Right To Access Or Purchase Copies Of All Records.
survey Date: 08/18/2011
date Of Correction: 08/23/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/07/2011
date Of Correction: 04/26/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/20/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 03/16/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/13/2009
date Of Correction: 12/22/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/15/2010
date Of Correction: 11/22/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/18/2011
date Of Correction: 04/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/15/2010
date Of Correction: 11/22/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.8 % (0.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (32.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (9.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.9 % (13.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (11.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (24.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9 % (23.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
24 % (60.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
16.4 % (67.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7 % (10.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 % (1.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1 % (13 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3 % (6.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1 % (4.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
62.4 % (19.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 % (6.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (16.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 % (22.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
14.2 % (67.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
9.3 % (65.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
26.3 (79.3) % (8.96 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved