VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MANORCARE OF LIBERTYVILLE

MANORCARE OF LIBERTYVILLE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MANORCARE OF LIBERTYVILLE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LIBERTYVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LIBERTYVILLE
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 1500 SOUTH MILWAUKEE AVENUE  
Zip Code 60048  
Phone 8478163200  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
110  (18.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
110  (18.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2  (0.43 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.75  (0.16 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (5.14 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/19/2011
date Of Correction: 03/24/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/12/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/21/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/01/2009
date Of Correction: 10/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: 12/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/08/2011
date Of Correction: 09/09/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 01/19/2011
date Of Correction: 03/30/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/01/2009
date Of Correction: 10/01/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 09/01/2009
date Of Correction: 10/01/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 01/19/2011
date Of Correction: 03/24/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3 % (9.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 % (8.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.7 % (0.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.9 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.7 % (6.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.3 % (1.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.3 % (0.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.5 % (1.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.3 % (4.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4 % (6.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2 % (1.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.8 % (21.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (5.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 % (15.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (9.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.7 % (8.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74 % (7.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.3 % (1.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.1 % (1.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved