VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MAPLES REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER

MAPLES REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MAPLES REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WRENTHAM   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WRENTHAM
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 90 TAUNTON STREET  
Zip Code 2093  
Phone 5083847977  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
144  (35.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
133  (41.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
92 % (8.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/11/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/25/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
133  (41.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.01  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.9  (0.31 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (5.34 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8 % (6.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 % (12.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.8 % (14.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2 % (7.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.9 % (3.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98 % (13.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.3 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.8 % (4.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.3 % (12.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.9 (55.2) % (6.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.3 % (6.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.8 % (11.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.4 % (23.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 14.7:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved