VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MARMET CENTER

MARMET CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MARMET CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MARMET   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MARMET
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street ONE SUTPHIN DRIVE  
Zip Code 25315  
Phone 3049491580  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
90  (18.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
88  (3.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
88  (3.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 01/25/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/17/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 10/27/2011
date Of Correction: 11/17/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 11/18/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 07/21/2009
date Of Correction: 08/21/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 04/09/2009
date Of Correction: 05/28/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/01/2010
date Of Correction: 05/06/2010 

Electrical Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Installed Electrical Wiring And Equipment.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 01/24/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.3 % (0.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.2 (68.4) % (3.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6 % (10.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.9 % (7.07 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (14.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.5 % (1.04 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.3 % (22.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.1 % (0.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (43.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.8 % (7.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 % (1.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.6 % (9.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 % (6.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.2 % (4.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.3 % (9.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.8 % (9.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.4 % (1.82 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.1 % (1.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.5 % (25.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.6 % (7.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
26.9 % (9.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved